Answers For Creationists

scientist1After the recent Bill Nye / Ken Ham debate about evolution / creationism, BuzzFeed got 22 creationists to pose questions or comments towards “the other side”, aka people who understand in the Theory of Evolution by Natural Selection.

These are typical comments that creationists think are clever and will stump evolutionists. Turns out, they are all pretty solidly answerable, as demonstrated by Adam Rutherford over at The Guardian, and Phil Plait (The Bad Astronomer) over at Slate.

I love the answers that Adam and Phil provide. Adam’s are more humourous, but with plenty of science in there, whilst Phil’s focus more on providing the scientific evidence. I always find it amusing / sad how religious people say that without religion, without “God”, there is no meaning to life. It’s depressing that they need a divine creator to give them rules so they keep in check… take away God, and they would all suddenly go on a mass killing spree.

I probably could write more on the madness of religion and creationism, but it annoys me too much. Have fun reading Adam’s and Phil’s responses to these 22 “questions”. Onwards!

This entry was posted in Ramblings, Science and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to Answers For Creationists

  1. Pingback: Bill Nye – The Joy Of Discovery | Richer Ramblings

  2. Pingback: Useful Websites You Never Knew Existed | Richer Ramblings

  3. Pingback: TAM 2014 – Bill Nye – Keynote Talk | Richer Ramblings

  4. Pingback: Definitions Of Fact, Theory, And Law In Scientific Work | Richer Ramblings

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s